My observations of the content of knowledge reports during my time with the scientology criminal enterprise has shown that most of those contained hearsay, falsehoods, and/or omitted context. The noise in knowledge reports exceeded the signal substantially. Also, those reports were weighted for credibility based on the position of the originator in the scientology hierarchy. For example, a report by a staff member carries more credence against a common public than a report on another staff member of similar rank.
Hubbard's policy letter created a super-sized can of worms which feeds the incipient paranoia of organized scientology. I cannot think of a more effective and efficient means to create busy work, glut the internal communication channels, and target vulnerable people for hatchet jobs. In that respect, Hubbard demonstrated real "genius".
Knowledge Reports
Started by Rhythm, Jan 08 2010 05:01 PM
2 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 08 January 2010 - 05:01 PM
#2
Posted 13 February 2011 - 12:29 PM
I agree, KRs were really misapplied and many embellished these reports to the detriment of both staff & public.
#3
Posted 16 February 2011 - 12:42 AM
Quicksilver, on 13 February 2011 - 12:29 PM, said:
I agree, KRs were really misapplied and many embellished these reports to the detriment of both staff & public.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











