Jump to content


Knowledge Reports


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Rhythm

Rhythm

    Petty Officer 2nd Class

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 467 posts
  • LocationWestern Hemisphere

Posted 08 January 2010 - 05:01 PM

My observations of the content of knowledge reports during my time with the scientology criminal enterprise has shown that most of those contained hearsay, falsehoods, and/or omitted context. The noise in knowledge reports exceeded the signal substantially. Also, those reports were weighted for credibility based on the position of the originator in the scientology hierarchy. For example, a report by a staff member carries more credence against a common public than a report on another staff member of similar rank.
Hubbard's policy letter created a super-sized can of worms which feeds the incipient paranoia of organized scientology. I cannot think of a more effective and efficient means to create busy work, glut the internal communication channels, and target vulnerable people for hatchet jobs. In that respect, Hubbard demonstrated real "genius".

#2 Quicksilver

Quicksilver

    Raw Meat

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 13 February 2011 - 12:29 PM

I agree, KRs were really misapplied and many embellished these reports to the detriment of both staff & public.

#3 Rhythm

Rhythm

    Petty Officer 2nd Class

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 467 posts
  • LocationWestern Hemisphere

Posted 16 February 2011 - 12:42 AM

View PostQuicksilver, on 13 February 2011 - 12:29 PM, said:

I agree, KRs were really misapplied and many embellished these reports to the detriment of both staff & public.
I think the knowledge report system is destructive. Making it policy to rat other people out creates the opportunity for embellishment and false statements.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users